Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Olesia's avatar

It's easy to hurt a creative person

Expand full comment
Ruv Draba's avatar

Thank you for this story-part, Riri. You asked for responses, and here's mine.

There's a 19th century British tradition -- probably a European tradition -- to treat music as 'an accomplishment'. The sort of capability that would be paraded for marriageability and for status among neighbours. In the 19th century that was very much a middle-class affectation, but it's the middle classes who teach music, which meant that by the 20th century, working classes had picked this affectation up too. It puts enormous and unnecessary pressure on children who are drawn to music not because of how it looks to others, but because of what they can explore in themselves.

That's *not* the tradition of folk music, either. Folk music is community music. Everyone participates however they can, and they learn from one another. That's how African American music developed, how bluegrass developed, and how early country music developed. If you're poor enough and there's music in your community, you can sometimes get a better musical tradition than the affluent do.

The mass-produced guitar though, cracks that 'accomplishment' affectation wide open. Any kid whose family is more than working poor can pick a guitar up (and even the working poor can pick up a guitar from a pawn shop if they scrimp.) It's a versatile instrument offering percussion, rhythm and melody. You get a lot of self-developed learning opportunity with guitar; there are enough of them around that you can learn from friends, and by the 1950s the earliest Guitar Heroes can offer aspirations too.

Unfortunately by the second half of the 20th century, corporatisation replaced middle-class Accomplishment as the gatekeeper of guitar-playing. The Guy in the music store isn't just a misogynist but a corporate shill. The more shame he can pile on you and the more he can normalise branding and status, the pricier the guitar you'll buy in compensation and there goes your opportunity to adventure and to learn.

So there's a lot of socioeconomic context sitting underneath your experience, Riri. I'd venture that it's not just about being female; it's not just about your family and it's certainly not just about you.

For me, it was a fight between the narcissism in my family (my guitar-playing was their social 'property'), the slavish commercialisation of music among my friends (they were fans of whatever was on the radio or TV more than they were musical explorers), and the contention between music-for-interest and all the other things I had to do to claw out of my family's socioeconomic circumstances.

Music for me was never an answer to 'who am I', because you can't even *ask* 'who am I' while you're trying to survive economically. The introspection of 'who am I' is a luxury of housing security, financial security, personal safety and accurate social reflection. You might need to build a lot of that before you can avail yourself of that luxury.

So music has always been a 'how' for me instead -- how to reflect, explore, engage and contribute. Just as cooking and serving food can go with anything, so can music.

Giving yourself the space to explore that is key. But that space must include safety, intimacy and respect. Establishing that is your first priority. The need to do that isn't some sort of shame -- it's fundamental, and its absence will keep smacking you until you accept that it was always your own responsibility to create it.

I think you're doing that, Riri, although you sometimes seem overly conflicted about doing so. Regardless, I'm cheering here.

But by the same token I'm not persuaded that doing it to popular acclaim is ever the best measure. Your popular success might turn music into an income, but commercial musicianship isn't therapy nor authenticity either. 'What is music to me' and 'what will others pay me for' often don't converge -- even among commercially successful musicians, and neither question answers 'who am I' (which may be part of why so many musicians are chaotic, messed-up folk.)

So music is a worthwhile adventure, but won't teach us everything. There are personal foundations that we all need to establish too. It'd be great if it all got solved with gold Youtube plaque or a double-platinum album but the history of music shows that it definitely *doesn't*. :)

Expand full comment
55 more comments...

No posts